|
9/3/2006 Nearly every oil
field follows a similar bell curve. As production begins, the bell
curve steadily increases, eventually reaching an apex. This apex is
called peak oil, and it does not last very long. Inevitably, production
begins to decline, thereby creating the downward bell curve. In the United
States, peak oil occurred in 1970. That year, we produced 10 million
barrels per day. The apex only lasted a few months and then production
began to decline. Today we produce about 5 million barrels per day
(plus another 2 million in liquid equivalents, such as liquid natural
gas) and consume 20 million barrels per day. By 2010, we will produce
about 4 million barrels per day. If U.S. consumption stays at 20
million barrels per day (a conservative estimate), we will need to
import 70% of our oil needs by 2010. Thus, we are entering a very
precarious era. To make matters
worse, global oil production is peaking. In fact, it is my opinion that
peak oil is imminent. My 300+ hours of research on this subject has led
to three conclusions: One number that
stood out to me was 90 million barrels per day. This is the expected
demand by 2010. When I looked at the forecasted production data, I
realized that this number was likely not going to be reached. Currently
we are producing 85 million barrels per day and demand is expected to
increase about 1.5% for the next few years. Yes, new production is
coming online, but there are a limited number of projects that will
begin production in the next few years. These projects must offset
annual net production declines at existing fields of 2.5%, and a
projected annual demand increase of 1.5%. To meet the
expected 1.5% annual demand increase for the next few years
(2006-2010), production must reach 90 million barrels per day. This
will require an increase of about 14 million barrels per day of new
production. Can global oil production add 14 million barrels per day
over the next few years? It’s possible, but unlikely. What is
more likely is that peak oil production will never reach 90 million
barrels per day, but something closer to 88. If you want an estimated
time for peak production, my bet is 2008. This will also likely be the
year when oil reaches $100 a barrel. We are literally on the precipice
of $100-a-barrel oil. Why is this
happening? We stopped finding oil. Peak discovery was in 1965. Since
then, discovery has steadily decreased. By 2010, discoveries will be
paltry, likely only 3-4 billion barrels (about one month’s
worldwide demand). Moreover, the last year we found any significant
quantities of oil was 2000. Thus, the pipeline for new projects is soon
going to dry up. In 2004, 29.9
billion barrels of oil were consumed worldwide, while only 7.6 billion
barrels of new oil reserves were discovered. Thus, we consumed 4
barrels for every barrel found. In 2005, 30.4
billion barrels of oil were consumed worldwide, while only 5 billion
barrels of new oil reserves were discovered. Thus, we consumed 6
barrels for every barrel found. Perhaps the most
significant evidence of peak oil is the decline of oil discoveries
since 2000. For, without discoveries, there can be no new production. There are
approximately 1.3 trillion barrels of oil reserves claimed by oil
companies. This does not include the Tar Sands in Canada or the extra
heavy oil in Venezuela, which are considered unconventional oil. This
1.3 trillion number is inflated, because OPEC countries overestimate
their total in order to get larger production quotas. It is projected
that it will take 30-35 years to consume all of the remaining reserves.
However, most likely, we only have 15-20 years of plentiful supply (oil
available for sale on the global market). Once we get towards the end,
there is going to be less exporting and massive shortages. Many
countries will keep their last remaining barrels for themselves. Plentiful supply
for the next 15-20 years does not mean that demand will be met. For,
demand will exceed supply long before we run out of plentiful oil,
thereby disrupting the supply chain and causing economic havoc. After
we reach peak oil, the price will soar, thereby depressing demand. This
will allow supply and demand to find an equilibrium, thereby reducing
or possibly preventing shortages. Peak production
is also evidenced by the fact that production is either declining or on
the precipice of decline in every country except Canada, Venezuela, and
the Middle East (where the majority of reserves remain). Soon the
Middle East will have to increase production dramatically on an annual
basis to meet world demand. At a certain point, this will not be
possible, and global peak production will be reached. Note that Canada
and Venezuela's increases of unconventional oil are minimal on an
annual basis. U.S. government
economic planners (EIA – Energy Information Agency, part of the
U.S. Department of Energy) currently project global peak production to
be around 2015. This seems way too optimistic to me. The current excess
worldwide production capacity is estimated to be only 1.5 million
barrels per day. In fact, only one country, Saudi Arabia, claims any
excess production capacity (a verbal declaration, without any
documentation). With future demand requiring at least 3.4 millions
barrels per day of new production each year, this leaves new projects
to meet demand. Simply put, soon there aren't going to be enough new
projects. Nearly all of the
major oil companies cite one of these three organizations when they
debunk peak oil. Other than the CEO of Total (France’s largest
oil company), all of the major oil companies have debunked peak oil,
claiming it is decades away. With the mainstream media accepting the
information from these organizations, as well as quotes from the CEOs
of the major oil producers, there has not yet been a cry for changes in
our energy policy. When you look at
the current top 20 producers, who account for 85% of production,
it is apparent that they will not be able to expand production for much
longer:
2005
2007 (Est.)
Direction (2008-2010) Once we get to
2009 and beyond, the possibility of increased production is minimal and
a decline is much more likely. The numbers are stunningly clear. There
simply is not going to be enough new oil to offset oil declines
worldwide. Norway reached
peak in 2000 at 3.1 million barrels per day. Today they are nearing 2.5
million barrels per day and their net decline rate is at 11% and
increasing annually. By 2010, Norway will be down to 1.6 million
barrels per day, removing nearly 1 million barrels per day from the
export market. What is happening
to Norway is also happening to the United Kingdom. They peaked in 1999
at 2.8 million barrels per day. Today they are nearing 1.5 million
barrels per day and their net decline rate is at 12.5% and increasing
annually. They became a net oil importer this year. Iran is
considered past peak and are expected to maintain their current
production rate the rest of this decade and beyond. Even with their
substantial reserves they will not be able to increase production. Iraq is at war.
The odds of them ramping up production are minimal the rest of this
decade. If peace ever comes to Iraq, they have potential to double
production to 4 million barrels per day (although this will take years
to implement). Mexico is on the
precipice of major declines. Their exports to the United States
are expected to drop from the current 1.5 million barrels per day, to
less than 1 million barrels per day before the end of the decade. If
Cantarell declines more rapidly than expected, ALL Mexican oil exports
could stop shortly after the end of the decade. Currently, 8% of
our oil imports come from Mexico. Who is going to make that up? If that
doesn't concern you, how about this: nearly 50% of Mexico's budget
comes from oil exports. Very soon annual
production declines will be nearly 1 million barrels per day from just
three countries: Norway, United Kingdom, and Mexico. Norway and Mexico
are currently two of the world’s largest exporters. It's unlikely
they will even be exporting much beyond 2012. Whereas we have
major oil producers with large net decline rates, there is not enough
new oil to offset these ongoing and increasing declines. Currently there
are only a limited number of new projects around the world scheduled to
begin production in 2006-2009. If these projects cannot reach 14
million barrels per day, then we will most likely have reached peak
oil, and demand will not be met. Location of New Projects Potential New Production (in barrels per day): It is difficult
to find information about projected production for future projects. One
source that I found, Jeff Rubin, the chief economist at CIBC World
Markets, predicts new oil production to be 3.5 million barrels per day
in 2006, 3 in 2007, and 3 in 2008. If you add these up, he is expecting
9.5 million barrels of increased production over the next three years. Another source I
found was Chris Skrebowski. His “MegaProject” spreadsheet
lists new projects due to come online this decade. He has concluded
from his research that new projects should average about 3.5 million
barrels of new oil per day the rest of this decade. Thus, he expects
new production to reach the 14 million barrels of new oil that I think
will be needed to meet demand. I will not be
surprised if new production falls somewhere between Jeff Rubin’s
and Chris Skrebowski’s forecasts. Thus, it will probably be
somewhere around 10.5 million barrels. This implies Peak Oil around 88
million barrels per day. Another source I
found was Oilcast #28 on OilCast.com. This audio file includes an
interview with a PEMEX (Mexico) engineer. He has a few insightful
comments. 1) Peak oil will be somewhere between 85 and 90 million
barrels per day. 2) The Saudis are producing at maximum capacity. 3) It
is unlikely the Saudis will produce much more than what they are
currently producing. If you add up the
future projects, without Saudi Arabia meeting their forecasted
production, we are in trouble. With their claim of increasing
production 3.5 million barrels per day to 12.5, they are being depended
on as the producer of last resort. Personally, I think 12.5 barrels per
day is a pipedream. We’ll soon find out. In Saudi Arabia,
6 giant fields produce 90 percent of their oil. All of these giants are
old (beginning production in the 1950s and 1960s) and mature, and
likely past their peak production. In 1982, OPEC countries stopped
releasing production and reserve numbers on a field by field basis. In
effect, they became secretive and have remained secretive. For this
reason, we can only estimate (guess) when each field will reach peak.
What we do know is that they have had ongoing technical problems with
each of their maturing giants. They have depended on water injection
for decades and are now experiencing recurring high water cuts. In
essence, they are pumping too much water out of the ground instead of
oil. Getting the easy
oil is long past for Saudi Arabia. They now have to revert to modern
technical innovations, which are becoming more and more complicated.
From what I read in “Twilight in the Desert” by Matthew
Simmons, the Saudis are struggling just to maintain production, let
alone have the ability to increase it. According to Simmon’s
analysis, he thinks it is likely that one of their giants is on the
precipice of decline (most likely Ghawar). If they lose one giant, they
will likely go into production decline as a country. Whereas U.S.
government planners are expecting Saudi Arabia to increase their
production to meet worldwide demand, even the Saudis have claimed that
the best they can do by 2009 is 12.5 million barrels per day. Sadad
al-Husseini, the recently retired head of exploration for Saudi Armaco,
has stated in interviews that the West is deluded to rely on Saudi
oil. He said that the most Saudi Arabia could produce is 12
million barrels a day, and even that may not be possible. What this
means is that Saudi Arabia will very likely peak this decade. In 1978 (the last
year Aramco was run by international oil companies such as BP, Exxon,
and Chevron), Aramco publicly released reserves on a field by field
basis that totaled 110 billion barrels in proven reserves. In 1979,
Aramco changed from foreign stewardship to Saudi Aramco (the Saudi
royal family). In 1982, after the formation of OPEC, the Saudis
increased their reserves to 150 billion barrels, although they had not
discovered any new fields. Today, they claim 260 billion barrels in
proven reserves, yet have never provided any documentation to
substantiate their claims. What we do know
about Saudi reserves is that no new oil has been found in any
significant quantities since 1978 (90% of their current production is
coming from old fields). In addition, we know that they have produced
more than 75 billion barrels since 1978. So, if we are to believe their
numbers, Aramco should have stated their reserves at 335 billion
barrels (260 + 75) in 1978. This number is so inflated as to be
ridiculous, and yet everyone uses it. (I hear the number 260 billion on
television all the time.) The correct number is closer to 125. When you put this
smaller reserve number in perspective, you realize that Saudi Arabia is
not the producer of last resort. In fact, it's possible that they have
already passed peak production, which for them was 10.5 million barrels
per day in 1980. My guess is that
Saudi Arabia is lying when they claim they will be producing 12.5
million barrels per day in 2009. Starting in July 2004 they began
producing 9.5 million barrels per day. This production rate remained
constant until April 2006, when it dropped to 9.1. In May, June, and
July, production remained approximately 9.0. My guess is that they are
having depletion problems and we will never produce 10.5 million
barrels per day again. All OPEC
countries have lied about their reserves in order to have larger
quotas. It is considered normal business practice for OPEC members.
Proof of this transgression was recently found in Kuwait. Petroleum
Intelligence Weekly recently reported that Kuwait has 48 billion
barrels of reserves, and not the 99 billion that they have claimed
publicly. I would bet this is the same for all OPEC countries. This
begs the question, how far off are the OPEC claimed reserves versus
actual proven reserves? Is the oil supply situation worse than we
realize? Some people point
to the huge unconventional reserves in Canadian Tar Sands as a producer
of last resort for the global market. Current Tar Sand production
in Canada is about 800 thousand barrels per day and is increasing
about 10-15 percent per year. They expect to produce about 2.5-3.0
million barrels a day by 2015. There is a large
quantity of Tar Sands in Canada. Current proven reserves are estimated
to be 350 billion barrels. Potential reserves are projected to be
as much as 2 trillion barrels. The problem is that it takes a long
time to increase production of unconventional oil. If they have enough
natural gas to expand production, more oil production will come
online after 2015. However, once we reach 2015, production
declines elsewhere will be intensifying. The bell curve for global
production from 2015 to 2030 is not pretty. Even if Canadian Tar
Sands production increases to 5 million barrels per day by
2025, this won't have much impact on global supplies. Another producer
with large potential production is Venezuela. They have potentially 1
trillion barrels of reserves in extra heavy unconventional oil. Their
heavy oil production should increase dramatically as oil prices rise.
We should see 1-2 million barrels per day of heavy oil
production sometime in the next decade. Like the Canadian Tar
Sands, it will be a slow process to expand production. They are
currently producing about 250 thousand barrels per day of extra heavy
oil. Peak oil could be
delayed until 2010, with small increases each year due to diminished
demand from high oil prices or a recession. If this happens, we could
see global production like the following: Anyway you look
at it, peak oil is imminent. Soon the net depletion rate will exceed 3
million barrels per day, and it’s not going to be possible to
produce 3 million barrels of new oil in a calendar year. As stated
previously, there aren’t going to be enough new projects. One interesting
thing I have learned from researching peak oil is that oil shortages
are not inevitable in the short term. Oil companies could meet global
demand for the rest of this decade and beyond. This possibility could
occur if prices are high enough to significantly decrease demand. Once
gasoline hits $5 to $7 per gallon, less people will be driving and
demand will go down. This could prevent shortages. However, once peak
oil is reached, there is nothing that will prevent high prices. If prices are
going to increase dramatically once we reach peak oil, at what point do
these high prices collapse the economy? Well, what can the economy
absorb? $100 a barrel? $200? All of my research leads to one
conclusion: we're in deep trouble. We have become utterly dependent on
cheap oil and it's about to get expensive. Initially, inflation is
going to rise as businesses increase their prices to pay their delivery
and energy bills. Consider how many delivery trucks are needed to move
goods in this country. Consider global transportation costs for
imported goods. Once the economy collapses, however, I expect deflation
(for instance, hair cuts for $5, Gardner services for $10). I don't see
how we can get through this without economic havoc. The magnitude of
the approaching oil crisis is beyond the average person’s
comprehension. It is such a huge problem that it is difficult to
conceptualize the ramifications. For instance, how do we commute to
work when it costs too much to drive? How do we pay for our food, gas,
and electric bills when they double and triple from the increased
energy cost? It’s mind boggling. All I know is that the world is
about to change dramatically and no one seems prepared. If you think
there is a substitute for oil, there isn't―at least not one that can
maintain our way of life. Substitutes are so lacking that the situation
is dire. Ethanol and other
biofuels are promising, but the volumes of production are unlikely to
meet demand or make much of an impact. For instance, we are currently
using 14% of our corn crop for ethanol and that only makes 12 million
gallons per day. Worse, creating ethanol is energy intensive. To
produce each gallon of ethanol requires nearly a gallon of fossil
fuels. Thus, the net energy benefit is not very efficient. Ethanol is
so energy intensive to produce, that without subsidies it isn’t
economical. Solar and wind
are good choices, but they will take years of investment to have
an impact. The Europeans are leading the way with wind. Countries like
Denmark literally rely on wind power. Hydrogen must be
converted into an energy source, which requires energy. It will be
decades until an efficient conversion process is found. Until
then we will be forced to use expensive natural gas and solar power to
convert Hydrogen to a usable energy source. Nuclear is
unlikely because of the huge cost and time required to build
plants. We will build a plant or two, but we are in a race to save our
economy. Will time run out before these plants can be financed? Liquefied coal is
a real possibility, but it will require new plants and billions of
dollars of investment. Along with wind, Coal to Liquid (CTL) is perhaps
are best hope. This is the one source that can replace oil as a
transportation fuel in significant quantities. Coal will be used for electricity. Like oil, natural gas and propane are going to get expensive and in short supply after 2010. The way I see it,
our only option is to start over. We have to create a new world based
on less energy requirements. Although I am not excited about the
prospect, I do see an opportunity to build a sustainable civilization.
The shift towards this new way of life is not a decade away, but years.
We are helplessly in the final months of cheap abundant oil. Twilight in the Desert by Matthew Simmons Beyond Oil by Kenneth Deffeyes Articles: Bank Says Saudi Top Field in Decline New Study Raises Doubts About Saudi Reserves Saudi Arabia: The Sands Run Out George W. Bush and Peak Oil Audio Interviews: Roger Bezdek Robert Hirsch Links: Peakoil.org Peakoil.net Peakoil.com TheOilDrum.com LifeAfterTheOilCrash.net Copad.org HubbertPeak.com OilCast.com EnergyBulletin.net |